John Bolton Tells CNN Donald Trump Cannot Have a Yes-Man as His Next Adviser from

John Bolton on CNN: Trump Needs an Independent Adviser

** **

Bolton: Trump's Next Adviser Must Not Be a 'Yes-Man'

** **

Ex-National Security Adviser Warns of 'Terrible Mistake'

** Former National Security Adviser John Bolton warned that President Donald Trump's next adviser must not be a "yes-man." In an interview with CNN, Bolton emphasized the importance of an independent voice in the White House, cautioning against the dangers of surrounding the president with only those who agree with him. Bolton, who served as Trump's fourth national security adviser, highlighted the critical role of an adviser who can provide objective perspectives and challenge the president's views. He stressed that such an adviser should be willing to "stand up" to Trump, even if it means disagreeing with him. Bolton's comments come amidst growing concerns about Trump's leadership style and his reliance on advisers who are seen as loyalists rather than independent thinkers. Critics argue that this lack of diversity in the president's inner circle has contributed to a number of foreign policy missteps. Bolton, who is known for his staunch conservative views, has been critical of Trump's foreign policy decisions in the past, particularly his withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal and his handling of North Korea. However, he has also defended Trump's decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital. Bolton's warning serves as a reminder of the importance of having independent voices in government. He argues that surrounding the president with "yes-men" can lead to "terrible mistakes" and hinder effective decision-making. **

Conclusion

** Bolton's comments highlight the ongoing debate over the role of advisers in the Trump administration. While some argue that the president needs loyalists who will support his agenda, others emphasize the importance of having independent voices who can provide objective perspectives and challenge his decisions. The outcome of this debate will have a significant impact on the direction of U.S. foreign policy in the years to come.